Australian Journal of Crop Science

Article | https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.26.20.09.pne198

Submitted: 02 December 2025 | Revised: 13 April 2026 | Accepted: 27 April 2026

Pages 700-708

Identification of bioactive compounds in Piper nigrum, Piper retrofractum, Piper betle, and Piper aduncum: exploring their potential as botanical nematicides

Mukhlis Ibrahim1,2, Siwi Indarti2*, Nugroho Susetya Putra2 and Valentina Dwi Suci Handayani3

1Doctoral Program in Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Sleman 55281, (Yogyakarta) Indonesia

2Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Sleman 55281, (Yogyakarta) Indonesia

3Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Sleman, 55281, (Yogyakarta) Indonesia

*Corresponding Author: siwi.indarti@ugm.ac.id

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-5268

Abstract: Plant-parasitic nematodes, particularly Meloidogyne spp., represent a major constraint to global agricultural productivity, causing significant yield losses in economically important crops. Reliance on synthetic nematicides has raised concerns due to environmental toxicity, human health risks, and the development of resistance, emphasizing the need for safer and sustainable alternatives. Botanical nematicides derived from plant secondary metabolites have emerged as promising candidates because of their biodegradability, lower ecological impact, and multiple modes of biological action. Members of the genus Piper are traditionally used in pest management and are known to contain diverse bioactive phytochemicals with pesticidal properties. This study aimed to identify and characterize the chemical constituents of methanolic leaf extracts from Piper nigrum, Piper retrofractum, Piper betle, and Piper aduncum using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS). The analysis confirmed the presence of multiple bioactive compound classes, including fatty acid amides (9-octadecenamide), terpenoids (caryophyllene, phytol, dillapiol), phenylpropanoids (eugenol, 3-allyl-6-methoxyphenol), and alkaloids — many of which have been reported to exhibit nematicidal or pesticidal activities. Among the species analyzed, 9-octadecenamide (oleamide) was predominant in both P. retrofractum and P. nigrum, while P. aduncum uniquely contained high concentrations of dillapiol. P. betle exhibited the highest proportion of phenylpropanoids, particularly 3-allyl-6-methoxyphenol. Shared compounds such as methyl stearate, hexadecanoic acid, and phytol across the four species suggest potential synergistic interactions contributing to nematicidal efficacy.

Keywords: Botanical nematicides, Dillapiol, GC-MS, Oleamide, Piper species.

Abbreviations: EI_electron ionization; GC-MS_Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry; m/z_mass-to-charge ratio; PPNs_plant-parasitic nematodes; RAP_relative abundance percentage.

Introduction

Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) are among the most damaging soil pathogens, causing significant yield losses in a wide range of crops worldwide. Estimates indicate global agricultural losses of over USD 100 billion annually due to nematode infestations, with root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.), lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.), and cyst nematodes (Heterodera spp.) being the most notorious species responsible for damage to roots, nutrient deficiency, and overall stunted plant growth (Jones et al., 2013; Nicol et al., 2011). Traditionally, synthetic nematicides have been the primary control method. Eventhough effective, these agrochemicals have been increasingly criticized for their environmental persistence, toxicity to non-target organisms, and accumulation in the food chain (Chitwood, 2002; Ntalli and Caboni, 2012). Furthermore, long-term use of synthetic nematicides has contributed to the development of resistance in nematode populations, raising the need for safer and more sustainable alternatives (Oka et al., 2000).

In response to these challenges, there has been growing interest in the use of plant-derived bioactive compounds referred to as botanical nematicides as environmentally friendly tools for nematode management. These compounds, also known as allelochemicals, include a variety of secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, terpenoids, phenolic acids, flavonoids, and fatty acid derivatives, many of which exhibit nematocidal, repellent, or growth-inhibitory properties (Helaly et al., 2018; Mwamula et al., 2022). The type, concentration, and biological activity of these compounds vary widely among plant species and even among different plant parts (Aviles-Gomez et al., 2022). Recent advances in analytical chemistry, particularly Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), have enabled the rapid and accurate identification of such phytochemicals from complex plant matrices, providing important insight into their potential as biopesticides (Oka et al., 2012). Among the vast diversity of medicinal plants, the genus Piper (family Piperaceae) has attracted particular attention due to its rich phytochemical content and ethnobotanical significance. Comprising over 1,000 species, Piper is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions and is known to produce a wide variety of biologically active secondary metabolites. In particular, species such as Piper nigrum, Piper retrofractum, Piper betle, and Piper aduncum have long been used in traditional medicine and agriculture for their antimicrobial, insecticidal, and antiparasitic properties (Kesba et al., 2021). Previous studies have reported the nematicidal effects of isolated Piper compounds such as piperine, phytol, dillapiol, and caryophyllene (Salehi et al., 2019).

Considering the urgency of searching sustainable pest control alternatives and the promising bioactivity of Piper metabolites, this study aims to analyse and compare the bioactive chemical constituents present in methanol extracts of P. nigrum, P. retrofractum, P. betle, and P. aduncum using GC-MS. The specific objectives are (1) to identify dominant secondary metabolites in each species, (2) to classify them according to their functional groups and known bioactivities, and (3) to evaluate their relevance for development as botanical nematicides. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge supporting eco-friendly, plant-based nematode management in sustainable agriculture.

Results and Discussion

GC-MS profiling of bioactive compounds

The GC-MS analysis of methanol extracts from the leaves of P. nigrum, P. retrofractum, P. betle, and P. aduncum revealed a diverse range of bioactive secondary metabolites. Across all species, major groups identified include terpenoids, fatty acid derivatives, phenolics, alkaloids, esters, and organosilicon compounds. Interestingly, variations in compound composition and relative abundance percentage (RAP) indicated species-specific phytochemical profiles, which may contribute to their distinct bioactivity as botanical nematicides.

Piper nigrum

The GC-MS analysis of P. nigrum leaf extract revealed the presence of 49 compounds (Fig 1.). The most dominant include benzene propanoic acid, methyl ester (12.66%), 4,7-methanoisobenzofuran-1,3-dione (10.64%), cyclohexanone, 2-methyl- (9.86%), and hydro cinnamic acid (8.98%). These compounds are primarily phenolic derivatives, known for their antimicrobial and nematostatic properties. Fatty acid amides such as 9-octadecenamide (11.92%) were also abundant, suggesting potential neurotoxic effects against nematodes. Furthermore, sesquiterpenes like copaene and caryophyllene were detected, which have been reported to disrupt nematode neuromuscular systems (Chitwood, 2002). Of note, several alkaloid-related compounds were identified, including 1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinone and β-piperidinopropiophenone, which exhibit neuroactive potential. The presence of diterpene alcohol phytol (5.63%) also supports nematicidal relevance, as this compound has shown acetylcholinesterase inhibition activity(Wuyts et al., 2006) (Table 1.).

Fig 1. GC-MS chromatogram of methanolic extract of P. nigrum Leaves.

Table 1. Compounds from P. nigrum Leaves Extracted using methanol.

No Rf RAP (%) Compound Chemical Formula Compound Group
1 3.169 0.67 Propanoic acid, 2-oxo-, methyl ester C4H6O3 Fatty acid derivative
2 3.567 0.33 Methane, (methylsulfinyl)(methylthio)- C3H8OS2 Organosulfur
3 3.688 0.12 Ethanedioic acid, dimethyl ester C4H6O4 Ester
4 6.604 0.73 Glycerin C3H8O3 Polyol
5 6.797 0.23 2-Hydroxy-gamma-butyrolactone C4H6O3 Lactone
6 6.910 0.28 Decane C10H22 Hydrocarbon (alkane)
7 7.476 0.17 1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl- C8H18O Alcohol
8 8.321 0.92 1-Ethyl-2-pyrrolidinone C6H11NO Alkaloid
9 8.819 0.22 Linalool C10H18O Terpenoid (Monoterpenoid alcohol)
10 9.973 0.71 2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro- C5H6O2 Lactone
11 10.906 0.43 Benzofuran, 2,3-dihydro- C8H8O Aromatic heterocycle
12 11.124 0.37 3-Phenylpropanol C9H12O Alcohol
13 11.765 12.66 Benzenepropanoic acid, methyl ester C10H12O2 Phenolic ester
14 12.170 9.86 Cyclohexanone, 2-methyl- C7H12O Ketone
15 12.714 8.98 Hydrocinnamic acid C9H10O2 Phenolic acid
16 13.400 0.11 Copaene C15H24 Sesquiterpene
17 14.069 0.52 Caryophyllene C15H24 Sesquiterpene
18 14.199 0.38 (1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-8-Isopropyl-1-methyl-3-met C15H24 Sesquiterpene
19 14.477 0.65 Cyclooctasiloxane, tetradecamyl- C14H42O7Si7 Organosilicon
20 14.911 0.44 (1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-8-Isopropyl-1-methyl-3-met C15H24 Sesquiterpene
21 15.280 0.40 Phenylpropanamide C9H11NO Amide
22 16.158 0.29 2,2,4-Trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate C16H30O4 Plasticizer (Ester)
23 16.583 0.47 Cyclooctasiloxane, hexadecamyl- C16H48O8Si8 Organosilicon
24 16.720 3.14 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- C18H35NO Fatty acid amide
25 16.826 3.27 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- C18H35NO Fatty acid amide
26 16.895 2.52 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- C18H35NO Fatty acid amide
27 16.995 0.57 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- C18H35NO Fatty acid amide
28 17.628 0.18 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(3-hydroxybutyl)-3,5,5 C13H22O2 Ketone
29 18.625 0.62 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3,5,5-trimeth C9H14O2 Ketone
30 19.080 0.29 Tetra decanal C14H28O Aldehyde
31 19.139 0.15 0.32 2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl- C18H36O Ketone
32 19.384 0.25 0.42 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 5-methyl-2-(1-methyleth C10H16O Ketone
33 19.984 0.10 0.23 7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro(4,5)deca-6,9-dien C17H24O3 Spiro compound
34 20.132 1.06 1.86 Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester C17H34O2 Fatty acid ester
35 20.336 10.64 12.74 4,7-Methanoisobenzofuran-1,3-dione, 3a,4,7,7 C8H6O4 Aromatic anhydride
36 20.586 2.96 2.73 n-Hexadecenoic acid C16H32O2 Fatty acid
37 20.710 1.07 0.65 Bicyclol[2.2.2]oct-5-en-2-one C8H10O Ketone
38 21.681 2.62 2.71 .beta.-Piperidine propiophenone C14H19NO Alkaloid
39 22.613 1.38 1.26 1-Octadecanol C18H38O Fatty alcohol
40 22.771 0.53 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl Este C19H34O2 Fatty acid ester
41 22.886 1.11 11,14,17-Eicosatrienoic acid, methyl ester C21H36O2 Fatty acid ester
42 23.012 2.80 Benzene propanoic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester C13H18O2 Phenolic ester
43 23.095 5.63 Phytol C20H40O Diterpene alcohol
44 23.390 0.38 Methyl stearate C19H38O2 Fatty acid ester
45 23.623 3.88 .delta.-6,7-Octalin, 1.beta.,4.beta.-dihydroxy-4 C10H14O3 Sesquiterpene derivative
46 24.130 1.69 N-Phenethyl-2-methylbutylidenimine C13H20N2 Imine (Alkaloid derivative)
47 24.570 1.14 Hexadecane C16H33NO Fatty acid amide
48 24.795 0.14 .beta.-Piperidine propiophenone C14H19NO Alkaloid
49 30.150 11.92 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- C18H35NO Fatty acid amide

Piper retrofractum

The leaf extract of P. retrofractum yielded 23 compounds (Fig 2.). The most abundant was 9-octadecenamide (29.60%), followed by hexadecanoic acid methyl ester (7.49%) and methyl stearate (4.49%). Fatty acid esters and amides accounted for a significant proportion, supporting their role as cuticle-penetrating agents or inhibitors of nematode development. Notably, the presence of phytol and methyl stearate also supports nematicidal activity through membrane disruption mechanisms (Khan et al., 2020). Siloxanes such as cyclohexasiloxane and cyclooctasiloxane were also detected, which may be artefacts of sample processing, but they are worth noting due to potential bioavailability effects when co-occurring with active metabolites. (Table 2.).

Fig 2. GC-MS chromatogram of methanolic extract of P. retrofractum Leaves.

Table 2. Compounds from P. retrofractum Leaves Extracted using methanol.

No Rf RAP (%) Compound Chemical Formula Compound Group
1 3.091 1.87 2,3-Butanediol C₄H₁₀O₂ Alcohol
2 3.219 2.15 2,3-Butanediol C₄H₁₀O₂ Alcohol
3 11.748 2.94 Hexadecane C₁₆H₃₄ Alkane
4 12.065 3.70 Cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl- C₁₂H₃₆O₆Si₆ Siloxane
5 12.107 3.47 Cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl- C₁₂H₃₆O₆Si₆ Siloxane
6 12.760 3.85 Cyclohexene, 4-ethenyl-4-methyl-3-(1-methyl) C₉H₁₄ Alkene
7 14.478 7.70 Cycloheptasiloxane, tetradecamethyl- C₁₄H₄₂O₇Si₇ Siloxane
8 14.829 0.83 Hexadecane C₁₆H₃₄ Alkane
9 15.035 1.07 Naphthalene, decahydro-4a-methyl-1-methyl C₁₁H₂₀ Polycyclic hydrocarbon
10 16.155 1.45 2,2,4-Trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate C₁₆H₃₀O₄ Diol ester
11 16.213 2.00 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulen-7-ol, decahydro-1,1,7 C₁₅H₂₆O Sesquiterpenoid
12 16.584 3.97 Cyclooctasiloxane, hexadecamethyl- C₁₆H₄₈O₈Si₈ Siloxane
13 16.794 3.47 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulen-7-ol, decahydro-1,1,7 C₁₅H₂₆O Sesquiterpenoid
14 18.387 1.62 Cyclononasiloxane, octadecamethyl- C₁₈H₅₄O₉Si₉ Siloxane
15 18.529 1.54 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulen-7-ol, decahydro-1,1,7 C₁₅H₂₆O Sesquiterpenoid
16 20.137 7.49 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester C₁₇H₃₄O₂ Fatty acid ester
17 22.776 1.22 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester C₁₉H₃₄O₂ Fatty acid ester
18 22.900 1.74 6-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- C₁₉H₃₆O₂ Fatty acid ester
19 23.099 1.79 Phytol C₂₀H₄₀O Diterpene alcohol
20 23.413 4.49 Methyl stearate C₁₉H₃₈O₂ Fatty acid ester
21 25.160 9.02 Isoxaben C₁₈H₂₄N₂O₄ Benzamide (Herbicide)
22 25.295 3.03 Heptadecylic acetate C₁₉H₃₈O₂ Fatty acid ester
23 30.134 29.60 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- (Oleamide) C₁₈H₃₅NO Fatty acid amide

Piper betle

The extract of P. betle yielded 33 identifiable compounds (Fig. 3). The dominant constituent was 3-allyl-6-methoxyphenol (51.16%), also known as chavicol, a phenylpropanoid with well-documented antimicrobial and nematicidal activity. Benzoic acid, 2,5-dimethyl- (12.77%) and dillapiol (2.38%) were also present in high concentrations (Guerrini et al., 2009).These compounds have been reported to induce oxidative stress and apoptosis in nematodes (Kundu et al., 2021). Sesquiterpenes such as γ-muurolene, α-guaiene, and caryophyllee were present along with their oxygenated derivatives like caryophyllene oxide. These compounds have been documented to disrupt sensory function and reproduction of nematodes (Madhumita et al., 2019). The presence of aliphatic and aromatic alcohols further supports nematostatic actions through surface film disruption or neuroinhibitory effects. (Table 3.).

Fig 3. GC-MS chromatogram of methanolic extract of P. betle Leaves.

Table 3. Compounds from P. betle Leaves Extracted using methanol.

No Rf RAP (%) Compound Chemical Formula Compound Group
1 3.549 0.87 Acetic acid, fluoro-, ethyl ester C₄H₇FO₂ Carboxylic acid ester
2 3.674 0.71 Ethanedioic acid, dimethyl ester C₄H₆O₄ Dicarboxylic acid ester
3 4.880 0.52 Glyceraldehyde C₃H₆O₃ Aldehyde
4 6.769 0.25 2-Hydroxy-gamma-butyrolactone C₄H₆O₃ Lactone
5 7.466 0.17 1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl- C₈H₁₈O Alcohol
6 9.417 0.75 Cyclopentasiloxane, decamethyl- C₁₀H₃₀O₅Si₅ Organosilicon
7 10.280 0.48 Eucalyptol C₁₀H₁₈O Monoterpenoid
8 11.390 8.31 1H-Inden-5-ol, 2,3-dihydro- C₉H₁₀O Aromatic alcohol
9 12.101 1.28 Cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl- C₁₂H₃₆O₆Si₆ Organosilicon
10 12.985 0.33 Eugenol C₁₀H₁₂O₂ Phenylpropanoid
11 13.194 51.16 3-Allyl-6-methoxyphenol C₁₀H₁₂O₂ Phenylpropanoid
12 14.052 0.22 Caryophyllene C₁₅H₂₄ Sesquiterpene
13 14.471 1.27 Cycloheptasiloxane, tetradecamethyl- C₁₄H₄₂O₇Si₇ Organosilicon
14 14.577 12.77 Benzoic acid, 2,5-dimethyl- C₉H₁₀O₂ Aromatic acid
15 14.771 1.28 .gamma.-Muurolene C₁₅H₂₄ Sesquiterpene
16 14.820 0.24 Octane, 2-methyl- C₉H₂₀ Alkane
17 15.009 1.55 (4-tert-Butylphenoxy)acetate,TMS C₁₃H₂₀O₃Si Aromatic ester
18 15.075 0.19 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol C₁₄H₂₂O Tertiary phenol
19 15.101 0.25 .alpha.-Guaiene C₁₅H₂₄ Sesquiterpene
20 15.227 2.71 3-Allyl-6-methoxyphenyl acetate C₁₂H₁₄O₃ Phenolic ester
21 15.342 0.55 (3R,3aR,3bR,4S,7R,7aR)-4-Isopropyl-3,7-dim C₁₅H₂₄O Oxygenated sesquiterpene
22 16.145 0.47 2,2,4-Trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate C₁₆H₃₀O₄ Plasticizer ester
23 16.270 0.34 Caryophyllene oxide C₁₅H₂₄O Oxygenated sesquiterpene
24 16.583 2.38 Dillapiol C₁₂H₁₄O₄ Phenylpropanoid
25 17.773 0.20 Methyl stearate C₁₉H₃₈O₂ Fatty acid ester
26 18.606 0.36 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3,5,5-trimeth C₉H₁₄O₂ Terpenoid ketone
27 19.061 0.42 Albuterol C₁₃H₂₁NO₃ Alkaloid derivative
28 20.118 2.79 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester C₁₇H₃₄O₂ Fatty acid ester
29 20.577 0.32 n-Hexadecanoic acid C₁₆H₃₂O₂ Saturated fatty acid
30 22.867 0.48 9,12-Octadecadienoyl chloride, (Z,Z)- C₁₈H₃₁ClO Fatty acid derivative
31 23.080 0.16 Phytol C₂₀H₄₀O Diterpenoid alcohol
32 23.371 1.70 Methyl stearate C₁₉H₃₈O₂ Fatty acid ester
33 30.081 4.52 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- C₁₈H₃₅NO Fatty acid amide

Piper aduncum

The GC-MS analysis of P. aduncum leaf extract showed 50 identified compounds (Fig 4.). was the most dominant (62.3%), followed by tetradecane (7.92%) and dl-α-tocopherol (2.51%). Dillapiol is a well-known phenylpropanoid with proven nematicidal and insecticidal properties through inhibition of monooxygenases and neurotransmitter enzymes (Guerrini et al., 2009). Terpenoids such as germacrene D, copaene, and humulene were also present, further strengthening the potential of this species. In addition to phenylpropanoids and terpenes, a variety of fatty acids (hexadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid), alcohols, and alkaloids were detected. For example, the detection of 5H-indeno[1,2-b]pyridine and 2-pyrrolidinone derivatives highlights potential neuromodulatory activity. The identification of dl-α-tocopherol (2.51%) suggests antioxidant properties that may enhance plant defense mechanisms and persistence of bioactive compounds. (Table 4.).

Fig 4. GC-MS chromatogram of methanolic extract of P. aduncum Leaves.

Table 4. Compounds from P. aduncum Leaves Extracted using methanol.

No Rf RAP (%) Compound Chemical Formula Compound Group
1 9.805 0,3 Copaene C₁₅H₂₄ Terpenoid
2 9.990 0,33 Cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2,4-bis(1- C₁₂H₂₀ Terpenoid
3 10.403 3 1R,3Z,9S-4,11,11-Trimethyl-8-methylenebic C₁₅H₂₄ Terpenoid
4 10.505 0,69 1H-Cyclopenta[1,3]cyclopropa[1,2]benzene, C₁₂H₁₂ Polycyclic aromatic
5 10.669 0,25 (1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-8-Isopropyl-1-methyl-3-m C₁₅H₂₄ Terpenoid
6 10.799 0,71 Humulene C₁₅H₂₄ Sesquiterpenoid
7 10.835 0,26 1H-Cyclopenta[1,3]cyclopropa[1,2]benzene, C₁₂H₁₂ Polycyclic aromatic
8 10.945 0,26 1-Naphthalenol, 1,2,3,4,4a,7,8,8a-octahydro- C₁₀H₁₄O Phenol
9 11.044 0,58 Germacrene D C₁₅H₂₄ Terpenoid
10 11.113 7,92 Tetradecane C₁₄H₃₀ Alkane
11 11.275 0,09 .gamma.-Muurolene C₁₅H₂₄ Terpenoid
12 11.408 1,75 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahydro-4,7-dim C₁₂H₁₈ Aromatic terpenoid
13 11.587 0,35 Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-(2-propenyl)- C₁₂H₁₆O₃ Phenylpropanoid
14 12.113 0,55 Caryophyllene oxide C₁₅H₂₄O Oxygenated terpenoid
15 12.226 0,55 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulen-4-ol, decahydro-1,1, C₁₅H₂₄O Sesquiterpenoid
16 12.338 62,3 Dillapiol C₁₂H₁₄O₄ Phenylpropanoid (major compound)
17 12.440 0,03 (2E,4S,7E)-4-Isopropyl-1,7-dimethylcyclode C₁₅H₂₄ Terpenoid
18 12.480 0,05 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulen-7-ol, decahydro-1,1, C₁₅H₂₄O Terpenoid
19 12.637 0,16 .tau.-Cadinol C₁₅H₂₆O Terpenoid alcohol
20 12.725 0,04 Agarospirol C₁₅H₂₄O Sesquiterpenoid
21 12.784 0,77 1-Tetradecanol C₁₄H₃₀O Alcohol
22 12.855 0,55 1-Oxa-2,4,6-trisilacyclohexane, 2,2,4,4,6,6-h C₆H₁₈O₃Si₃ Siloxane
23 12.960 0,51 Heptadecane C₁₇H₃₆ Alkane
24 13.955 0,1 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,6-dimethy 158.80 C₁₂H₁₆ Polycyclic aromatic
25 14.055 1,56 Pentadecanal- C₁₅H₃₀O Aliphatic aldehyde
26 14.100 0,11 1-Dodecanol, 3,7,11-trimethyl- C₁₅H₃₂O Alcohol
27 14.236 0,2 1-Octadecyne C₁₈H₃₄ Alkyne
28 14.304 0,97 Benz[b]dihydropyran-6-ol, 2,2,5,7,8-pentam C₁₁H₁₄O₂ Flavonoid-like
29 14.381 0,86 Pentadecanal- C₁₅H₃₀O Aldehyde
30 14.655 0,14 7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro(4,5)deca-6,9-die C₁₆H₂₆O Synthetic phenolic
31 14.702 0,72 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester C₁₇H₃₄O₂ Fatty acid ester
32 14.949 0,85 n-Hexadecanoic acid C₁₆H₃₂O₂ Fatty acid
33 15.895 0,2 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl est C₁₉H₃₄O₂ Unsaturated fatty acid
34 15.939 0,59 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester, ( C₁₉H₃₂O₂ PUFA
35 16.092 2,14 Triacontanoic acid, methyl ester C₃₁H₆₂O₂ Long-chain fatty acid
36 16.330 0,35 Octadecanoic acid C₁₈H₃₆O₂ Fatty acid
37 16.473 0,26 Hexadecanamide C₁₆H₃₃NO Fatty amide
38 16.610 0,06 9-Tricosene, (Z)- C₂₃H₄₆ Unsaturated hydrocarbon
39 16.784 0,95 2,2,9,9-Tetramethyldec-5-ene-3,7-diyne C₁₄H₂₂ Hydrocarbon
40 17.112 0,45 (3,7-Dimethyl-octa-2,6-dienyl)-benzene C₁₄H₂₀ Terpenoid
41 17.200 0,07 1-Bromoeicosane C₂₀H₄₁Br Haloalkane
42 17.444 0,14 Androst-1-en-3-one, 17-hydroxy-, (5.alpha.,1 C₁₉H₂₆O₂ Steroid
43 17.614 2,95 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- C₁₈H₃₅NO Fatty acid amide
44 17.759 0,23 Octadecanamide C₁₈H₃₇NO Amide
45 19.210 0,63 5H-Indeno[1,2-b]pyridine C₁₁H₉N Aromatic alkaloid
46 19.420 0,16 2-Pyrrolidinone, 1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenyl- C₁₈H₂₁NO Alkaloid
47 19.745 0,03 1,3,5-Benzetriol, 3TMS derivative C₆H₆O₃ Polyphenol
48 19.901 0,66 1,3-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylhex C₂₄H₃₈O₄ Phthalate ester
49 20.396 0,08 Squalene C₃₀H₅₀ Triterpenoid
50 23.548 2,51 dl-.alpha.-Tocopherol C₂₉H₅₀O₂ Phenol (Vitamin E)

Materials and methods

Place and time

This research was carried out from January to March 2025. Identification of bioactive compounds contained in methanolic leaf extracts of P. nigrum, P. retrofractum, P. betle, and P. aduncum was conducted using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). The leaves were harvested from mature plants cultivated in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, and the analysis was performed at Agrotropica Learning Center (AGLC), Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Extract preparation

Fresh leaves of P. nigrum, P. retrofractum, P. betle, and P.aduncum were harvested and cleaned thoroughly under running tap water to remove dust and other surface impurities. The samples were then air-dried under shaded and well-ventilated conditions for 7 days to prevent degradation of thermolabile compounds. After drying, the leaves were weighed to determine their moisture content using the following formula (Apriyanto et al., 2018):

\[Moisture\ Content\ (\%) = \ \frac{BInitial\ Weight - Final\ Weight}{Initial\ Weight} \times 100\%\]

The dried leaves were subsequently ground using a high-speed blender and passed through a mesh sieve to obtain uniform particle size. The powdered samples were stored in airtight aluminum foil bags at room temperature in the dark to minimize exposure to light, moisture, and oxygen before extraction.

Extraction procedure

Each powdered leaf sample (500 g) was subjected to cold maceration using analytical-grade 70% methanol at a ratio of 1:4 (w/v), following the method described by Handoyo (2020). The maceration process was conducted at room temperature for 48 hours with intermittent stirring to ensure maximal extraction of secondary metabolites.

The extract was then filtered using Whatman No. 41 filter paper to separate the plant residues from the filtrate. The resulting filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Buchi R-210) at 50°C and 240 mbar, as outlined by Nailufar and Prijono (2017), until a thick, viscous extract was obtained. The concentrated extracts were stored in amber vials at 4°C until further phytochemical analysis using GC-MS.

GC-MS analysis

The identification of bioactive compounds in the methanolic leaf extracts of P. nigrum, P. retrofractum, P. betle, and P. aduncum was performed using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The analysis was conducted with a Shimadzu GC-MS QP2010 SE system equipped with a SH-Rxi-5Sil MS capillary column (30 m in length × 0.25 mm internal diameter × 0.25 µm film thickness). The oven temperature was initially set to 100°C and held for 5 minutes, then ramped at a rate of 15°C/min until reaching 300°C, and maintained at this final temperature for 30 minutes. The injector temperature was maintained at 300°C in splitless injection mode. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, following the protocol described (Kannan et al., 2016). Electron ionization (EI) was performed at 70 eV. The temperatures of the ion source and the interface were maintained at 230°C and 250°C, respectively. A 1 µL aliquot of each extract was injected, and full-scan mass spectra were acquired in the m/z range of 40–600. The resulting chromatograms were analyzed using the NIST20R mass spectral library.

Conclusion

Methanolic leaf extracts of P. nigrum, P. retrofractum, P. betle, and P. aduncum revealed diverse classes of bioactive compounds with varying composition and concentrations across species. All four Piper species contained secondary metabolites with known nematicidal potential, such as fatty acid amides (9-octadecenamide), phenylpropanoids, terpenoids (caryophyllene, germacrene D, illapiole), and fatty acid esters (illapiolec acid methyl ester). Notably, P. betle exhibited a high abundance of phenylpropanoids, while P. aduncum was dominated by illapiole, a potent nematicidal agent. These findings highlight the potential of Piper species as promising sources of sustainable botanical nematicides for integrated nematode management strategies.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank The Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) for providing the research facilities. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, through the doctoral scholarship program (ID number: 202312210310075).

Declaration of Interest Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest associated with this publication. All authors have contributed to the work and approve the final manuscript.

References

Apriyanto A, Susanti R, & Kurniawan B (2018) Analisis metode gravimetri untuk pengukuran kadar air dalam bahan pangan. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian. 19(1): 112–125.

Aviles-Gomez J, Cristóbal-Alejo J, Andrés MF, González-Coloma A, Carnevali G, Pérez-Brito D, Moo-Koh FA, & Gamboa-Angulo M (2022) Nematicidal screening of aqueous extracts from plants of the yucatan peninsula and ecotoxicity. Plants. 11(16): 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162138

Chitwood DJ (2002). Phytochemical based strategies for nematode control. annual review of phytopathology. 40(1): 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.032602.130045

Guerrini A, Sacchetti G, Rossi D, Paganetto G, Muzzoli M, Andreotti E, Tognolini M, Maldonado M E, & Bruni R (2009) Bioactivities of Piper aduncum L. and Piper obliquum Ruiz & amp; Pavon (Piperaceae) essential oils from eastern ecuador. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 27(1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2008.08.002

Handoyo DLY (2020). Pengaruh lama waktu maserasi (perendaman) terhadap kekentalan ekstrak daun sirih (Piper betle L.). Jurnal Farmasi Tincruta. 2(1): 34–41.

Helaly SE, Ashrafi S, Teponno RB, Bernecker S, Dababat AA, Maier W, & Stadler M (2018) Nematicidal cyclic lipodepsipeptides and a xanthocillin derivative from a phaeosphariaceous fungus parasitizing eggs of the plant parasitic nematode Heterodera filipjevi. Journal of Natural Products. 81(10): 2228–2234. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b00486

Jones JT, Haegeman A, Danchin EGJ, Gaur HS, Helder J, Jones MGK, Kikuchi T, Manzanilla‐López R, Palomares‐Rius J E, Wesemael WML, & Perry RN (2013) Top 10 plant‐parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology. 14(9): 946–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12057

Kannan M, Muthusamy P, & Venkatachalam U (2016) Quantification of bioactive components from medicinal herb ganoderma lucidum using HPTLC and GC-MS techniques. Research Journal of Biotechnology. 11(6): 49–57.

Kesba H, Abdel-Rahman A, Sayed S, & Al-Sayed AS (2021) Screening the nematicidal potential of indigenous medicinal plant extracts against Meloidogyne incognita under lab. and greenhouse conditions. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 31(1): 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00429-y

Khan R, Naz I, Hussain S, Khan RAA, Ullah S, Rashid MU, & Siddique I (2020) Phytochemical management of root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) kofoid and white chitwood by Artemisia spp. in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Brazilian Journal of Biology. 80(4): 829–838. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.222040

Kundu A, Dutta A, Mandal A, Negi L, Malik M, Puramchatwad R, Antil J, Singh A, Rao U, Saha S, Kumar R, Patanjali N, Manna S, Kumar A, Dash S, & Singh PK (2021) A Comprehensive in vitro and in silico analysis of nematicidal action of essential oils. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11: 614143.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.614143

Madhumita M, Guha P, & Nag A (2019) Extraction of betel leaves (Piper betle L.) essential oil and its bio-actives identification: process optimization, GC-MS analysis and anti-microbial activity. Industrial Crops and Products. 138: 111578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111578

Mwamula AO, Kabir MF, & Lee D (2022) A Review of the potency of plant extracts and compounds from key families as an alternative to synthetic nematicides: history, efficacy, and current developments. Plant Pathology Journal. 38(2): 53–77. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.RW.12.2021.0179

Nailufar N, & Prijono D (2017) Synergistic activity of Piper aduncum fruit and tephrosia vogelii leaf extracts against the cabbage head caterpillar, Crocidolomia pavonana. Journal of the International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences. 23(1): 102–110.

Nicol JM, Turner SJ, Coyne DL, Nijs LD, Hockland S, & Maafi ZT (2011) Current nematode threats to world agriculture. Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions. (pp. 21–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0434-3_2

Ntalli NG, & Caboni P (2012) Botanical nematicides: a review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 60(40): 9929–9940. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf303107j

Oka Y, Ben‐Daniel B, & Cohen Y (2012) Nematicidal activity of the leaf powder and extracts of Myrtus communis against the root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica. Plant Pathology. 61(6): 1012–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02587.x

Oka Y, Nacar S, Putievsky E, Ravid U, Yaniv Z, & Spiegel Y (2000) Nematicidal activity of essential oils and their components against the root-knot nematode. Phytopathology. 90(7): 710–715. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.7.710

Salehi B, Zakaria ZA, Gyawali R, Ibrahim SA, Rajkovic J, Shinwari ZK, Khan T, Sharifi-Rad J, Ozleyen A, Turkdonmez E, Valussi M, Tumer TB, Monzote Fidalgo L, Martorell M, & Setzer WN (2019) Piper species: a comprehensive review on their phytochemistry, biological activities and applications. Molecules. 24(7): 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071364

Wuyts N, De Waele D, & Swennen R (2006) Extraction and partial characterization of polyphenol oxidase from banana (Musa acuminata Grande naine) roots. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 44(5–6): 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.06.005